EL PLAN DEL DIABLO EN SU LIBRO

Embrutecer al hombre, destruyendo así la imagen de Dios en él.

El plan más antiguo para destruir al hombre es casi tan antiguo como la Creación, pero no estamos especulando, las pruebas de su existencia milenaria son tan reales como el día, y su lógica tan precisa como para ser la temática subyacente de la Sagrada Escritura.

Y dijo Dios: Hagamos al hombre a nuestra imagen, conforme a nuestra semejanza. (Génesis 1:26).

Una sola frase de insuperable elocuencia nos da la medida del hombre, insuperable, al grado de provocar la mayor envidia y consiguiente rebeldía del primer racista de la historia: "Luzbel"; tras su revuelta: "Satanás,"  o el adversario.

La imagen y semejanza nos hablan ya de una inteligencia capaz de entender y de comunicarse con la Inteligencia Infinita que nos creó, primera prueba de la paternidad de Dios refrendada por Jesucristo en el Evangelio:

Y no tengáis a nadie padre vuestro en la tierra, porque uno es vuestro Padre, el que está en los cielos. (Mat 23:9)


Esa perfección hacía invulnerable al hombre
El plan del Diablo exigía, por tanto, crear en el hombre un "talón de Aquiles," una imperfección, una herida por la cual pudiera vaciar al hombre de todas sus perfecciones.

La sacralidad de los nombres y las etiquetas del Diablo

Falto de discernimiento hasta el hundimiento

La Sagrada Escritura no es optativa, es obligatoria, sobre todo para un obispo.

Y en el terreno de la Sagrada Escritura los nombres son fundamentales desde Génesis hasta el Apocalipsis, y para todos los re direccionamientos intermedios en los que Dios manifiesta su voluntad cambiando los nombres con la explícita intención de separar y reorientar a su pueblo. De esta manera, Dios marca a un pueblo como elegido suyo dándole a conocer su nombre "Yo Soy". El Que Es como fuente de toda existencia, y fuera de Quien nada puede existir. Antes de eso, Dios convoca a Adán a nombrar a todos los animales como señal del señorío del hombre sobre la Creación. Cambia el nombre de Abram por Abraham (padre de muchos pueblos) y el de Saraí a Sara para que fuera madre de Isaac, su predilecto. A Jacob le da el nombre de Israel; e igualmente, Jesucristo con la misma autoridad cambia el nombre de Simón por Pedro para fincar sobre roca su Iglesia. Y de la misma manera nos reserva un nombre definitivo, eterno, a cada uno en particular: "'El que tiene oído, oiga lo que el Espíritu dice a las iglesias. Al vencedor le daré del maná escondido y le daré una piedrecita blanca, y grabado en la piedrecita un nombre nuevo, el cual nadie conoce sino aquel que lo recibe.'" Siempre piedra. Jamás algo maleable como la plastilina o el hierro, o el más dúctil acero pues en ello está el peligro.

Etiquetar con falsedad es la forma más efectiva de engañar.
 Lo que es igualmente bíblico, y tan bíblico como insuperablemente grave. Después de todo, Eva no hizo otra cosa que re etiquetar a Dios y al Diablo con los calificativos de embustero que aplicó al Único Veraz; y de veraz con que premió al embustero por excelencia. Este fue en esencia el Pecado Original; la forma en que engañándose a sí misma y emboletando en su viaje a Adán nos dejó a sus descendientes como burros desorejados.

¿Qué tiene de increíble entonces que Bernard Fellay aparezca orondo al pie de dos cartelones que anuncian a Benedicto como papa? ¿Cómo papa???

Con los antecedentes señalados, increíble no; ¡pero insuperablemente grave sí!

LIES, DAMN LIES, AND TAGGING LIES !!!

The ridicule of the undiscerning

 Tagging lies have proven to be the most effective means of deception.

Finding names, placing tags. . .
The Bible, our Holy Book and main source of inspiration is being ridiculed beyond measure. Clergymen like the one pictured above, Monsignor Bernard Fellay, head of the FSSPX is either unaware of the Bible's clear messages for our times, of our time's identity in Scripture, or he simply can't read. Incredible?

His religious order disagrees both, with modernism, and with the heretical, apostatizing content of the new doctrines of the Second Vatican Council, and its aftermath doctrinal expressions, and with the popes that have made this council the New Carta Magna of the Catholic Church. However, unbiblical and undiscerning, he, and his FSSPX insist on tagging as "popes" the series of usurpers described in the Gospel as The Abomination of Desolation in the Holy Place (Mathew 24:15). This, when, of course, the abomination cited can only be identified by the heresies and the apostasy of the Council!

In other words, you can't legitimately separate the Council's creed as fact from its subscribers and expounders, the malefactors (the "popes" risen to proclaim and expound the desolation's abominations) as they are one.

PROPHESIES FULFILLED AND THE TWO POPE PLOT – (The facts and the trend)

Suspect the Devil for the worst and thou wilt not fail!

"The Church will weep. The day is far off, but it will arrive without fault and near the day when two begin to make themselves sovereigns, but their days will not be many. You will see a sign, but you will not acknowledge it. However, do take note: In those times, women will dress like men and men like women." (Saint Vincent Ferrer 1350-1416)
The sign, the great unacknowledged sign has been the Second Vatican Council, And now, with Benedict returning to the Vatican we have two "sovereigns" living there. The plot, as we shall see, was well under way five decades before on the Council floor. The other sign of chaos —dress—has been carried further towards homosexual "marriage"

A Vatican Sham

 Vatican II was the fulfillment of prophesy; of Gospel prophesy, of Pauline prophesy, of La Salette. It was to deny the divinity of Christ and the exclusive titles of the only church founded by Him by an artifice called ecumenism. It was to deny religious significance by substituting religious truth by its opposite: religious liberty —(imagine the school board celebrating liberty by accepting any digit as a result for 2 + 2 together with four!)

THERE IS NO VALID POPE FRANCIS!!! --- INVALID CONCLAVE !!!

Distinguishing between the de facto and the de jure in Church events.





Lightning struck attesting to the fulfillment of Daniel's prophesy!

THERE IS NO POPE FRANCIS !!!

 This is the 'de facto' statement implied in Benedict's resignation against the conclave that elected him! So, from then on --on Benedict's testimony-- conclaves are invalid which means the cardinals aren't cardinals either --again by Benedict's testimony--, being incompetent to elect a pope!

THIS IS THE LAW, THIS IS THE FAITH.  
 Let's reason this out: A papal election has always been a major event, not only for Catholics, but for the entire evangelized world. However, never before had circumstances been more revealing. A papal resignation hadn't occurred in seven centuries; but more relevantly, previous resignations had been forced by imposing circumstances which left no alternative to the abdicator but to abdicate. Circumstances like banishment by imperial authorities, exile under persecution, all of them practically equivalent to a sede vacante; and only a previous case in which the incumbent had been forced to accept --by a non conclave in order to break a two year sede vacante impasse-- and thus could not be seriously expected to remain where neither his competence for the post nor his vocation could hold him. In this case, that of Pietro da Morrone in 1294 --to be later canonized as St. Celestine V-- it would mean a short reign of only 161 days.

 But Benedict's resignation is an absolute scandal to all those who rightfully feel this has been another destructive maneuver directed towards devastating the papacy; a defacement, an additional desacralization of what many consider necessarily holy and demandingly above reproach.

IS THE FUNERAL OF JOHN PAUL II MENTIONED IN THE GOSPEL?

Versión al inglés del original sito en: clic aquí.

After paying homage to Christ's enemy, the same government is readying to chop off all Cristian's heads in the USA 

George W. Bush, Laura Bush, George H. W. Bush, Bill Clinton, Condoleezza Rice, and Andrew Card

He had gone from Gog to Magog to achive unity against Christ, he devastated the faith in his encyclicals, and left a Church in shambles.

By the Talmudic Noahide laws Christians must be put to death for idolatry

Wheresoever the body shall be, there shall the eagles also be gathered together.

 As can be easily appreciated, the Gospel is fundamental to our understanding of Revelation on the end of times; and this in precise reference to the eschatological discourse in Matthew 24 giving us the signs that will precede the coming of Our Lord Jesus Christ.

 Let’s quote:

Lo, I have foretold it to you! “If therefore they shall say to you: ‘Behold he is in the desert’, go ye not out: ‘Behold he is in the closets’, believe it not. For as lightning cometh out of the east, and appeareth even into the west: so shall the coming of the Son of man be. Wheresoever the body shall be, there shall the eagles also be gathered together.

 INCONTROVERTIBLE SIGNS, and the eagles on the body. 
This mysterious phrase has put translators to the test. Since the eagles on the body are one more sign, among many, that we find in chapter 24 of Saint Matthew to identify the end of time and the return of Our Lord in Glory, hence the importance of the translations that we are about to see.

Thank you Atila Sinke Guimaraes for your summary

It Is Impossible To Beatify John Paul II

 Luis de Guerrero Osio y Rivas

 Summary of his Open Letter

 Our Lord Jesus Christ did not preach the same message as Buddha or Mohammed. The difference is even clearer between the Gospel of Christ and the preaching of the Jews, who rejected Jesus and ended by committing the Deicide. Further, with their Babylonian Talmud they entered Satanism and so fulfilled the prophecy of the Apocalypse (2:9, 3:9).

 These differences show the importance of the encounter at Assisi where John Paul II - as the highest exponent of the Modernism of Vatican II - tried to erase them by accepting the heresies along with the Gospel, and presenting the false religions as competing with the Church in giving honor to God.

 The characteristic of the true Catholic Church is to stress her differences from the false religions and distance herself from them as the one and only religion that honors Christ. She singled out and condemned the heretics. She promoted missions to convert those lost sheep.

Instead, the New Church, moved by human respect, has promoted ecumenism. It has minimized all the differences and established dialogue with the heretics. This ends with a single common denominator for all, which is the religion of man.

 The Catholic Church of old was unique and inimitable because Christ our Master and Lord is one and inimitable. If the Church abandons her identity and no longer belongs to the One True God, she loses her raison d’être.