The Seat of the Antichrist... Prophesy fulfilled!

St. Peter's Dome is blown away by Vatican Council II: The Rhine overflows contaminating the Tiber. . .  "When therefore you shall see the abomination of desolation, which was spoken of by Daniel the prophet, standing in the holy place". . . "Rome will apostatize and become the seat of the Antichrist. The Church will be in eclipse".

The total of our faith is founded on prophesy.

The first quotation is Mat 24:15, the second is from Our Lady of La Salette. Our Lord exalts Daniel's "Yea, he magnified himself even to the prince of the host, and by him the daily sacrifice was taken away, and the place of his sanctuary was cast down" Daniel 8:11. The head of the army, the prince of the host, den Fürsten des Heeres, hasta el jefe del ejército, ad principem fortitudinis magnificatus est, jusqu'au chef de l'armée. . . all Bibles, Catholic and Protestant, and in all languages convey the same message: The usurper, the goat that came flying over the face of the whole earth aggrandized itself to take over the papacy. "And I understood: and behold a he goat came from the west on the face of the whole earth, and he touched not the ground," (Dan 8:5)

 Only the pope could take away the daily sacrifice of the New Testament: the Holy Mass. This prophesy was fulfilled by the "Bugnini Novus Ordo Mass" decreed by Paul VI. No longer was it to be the Sacrifice on the Cross of Calvary, no longer a sacrifice, but a mockery of the Last Supper. This prophecy is fulfilled prophecy for and in our times, as flying armies are as Newtestamentary as the Second World War is modern! It is also in agreement with Mathew 25:32-54, "And before him shall be gathered all nations:

The Invaders, and. .

A brief English digest of the many previous articles in Spanish:

THE SEDEOCCUPANTIST HERESY

 By Luis de Guerrero Osio y Rivas

Just because they are there?

 Rome will apostatize and become the seat of the Antichrist.

The Church will be in eclipse. (La Salette)

Two heresies have been launched in the last 60 years seeking to destroy the Catholic Church, Modernism and Sede-occupantism. The first was recognized as the sum of all heresies by Pope St. Pius X; the second is easily recognizable by demands to grant full status ─and the corresponding authority of the papacy─ to the first group while pretending to remain orthodox in their beliefs. This two pronged attack ─one to revolutionize and the other to justify the legitimacy of the first group while disagreeing only on points of doctrine─ were literally an invasion of the Catholic Church by the agents of the spirit of apostasy. The apostasy of the Modernist group which defined itself by a revolutionary set of principles comprised in the doctrine of an apostate council known to history as the Second Vatican Council and its aftermath.

Breve apunte sobre un artículo de M. Richard Williamson ante la ya inocultable traición.

Domingo 27 mayo 2012

– ELEISON CCLIV

Foto tomada de Radio Cristiandad

Dice M. Williamson:

“Libros enteros han sido escritos sobre el tema de la libertad religiosa como la enseña el Concilio Vaticano II en su Declaración de 1965, Dignitatis Humanae. No obstante, la enseñanza revolucionaria de ese documento es clara: dada la dignidad natural de cada ser humano, ningún estado ni grupo social ni poder humano alguno puede obligar o forzar a hombre o grupo de hombres a actuar, en privado o en público, en contra de sus propias creencias religiosas, siempre y cuando se observe el orden público (DH # 2).

“Por el contrario, la Iglesia Católica siempre enseñó, hasta el Concilio Vaticano II, que todo Estado en cuanto tal tiene el derecho y aun el deber de impedir coercitivamente a sus ciudadanos de practicar públicamente cualquiera de sus falsas religiones, id est, todas las religiones no católicas, en tanto que tal imposición sea útil y no perjudicial para la salvación de las almas... 

Estos dos párrafos retratan una situación correctamente descrita como revolucionaria por el obispo, el cual, como obispo, enfatiza que la salvación de las almas es lo propio de la Iglesia; y que cualquier criterio contrario es devastador de su naturaleza misma. 

Para ello conviene analizar si el documento conciliar Dignitatis Humanae que parte del concepto de lo que es la dignidad humana para predicar lo correspondiente es válido; o, si por el contrario, es fraudulento como en el fondo denuncia M. Williamson.

Veamos: