miércoles, 13 de junio de 2012

The Invaders, and. .

A brief English digest of the many previous articles in Spanish:

 By Luis de Guerrero Osio y Rivas
Just because they are there?
 Rome will apostatize and become the seat of the Antichrist.
The Church will be in eclipse. (La Salette)

Two heresies have been launched in the last 60 years seeking to destroy the Catholic Church, Modernism and Sede-occupantism. The first was recognized as the sum of all heresies by Pope St. Pius X; the second is easily recognizable by demands to grant full status ─and the corresponding authority of the papacy─ to the first group while pretending to remain orthodox in their beliefs. This two pronged attack ─one to revolutionize and the other to justify the legitimacy of the first group while disagreeing only on points of doctrine─ were literally an invasion of the Catholic Church by the agents of the spirit of apostasy. The apostasy of the Modernist group which defined itself by a revolutionary set of principles comprised in the doctrine of an apostate council known to history as the Second Vatican Council and its aftermath.

 The crux of the apostasy becomes evident by the refusal to follow Jesus Christ intention to have His Church conquer the whole world in His name alone, for the salvation of all souls. The invaders’ acceptance ─a matter unheard of before the Council─ of competing figures such as Buddha, Muhammad, or Luther, etc.; and of their doctrines as alternative ways to salvation contradict Christ’s words: “Go ye into the whole world and preach the gospel to every creature. He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved: but he that believeth not shall be condemned” (Mark 16:15-16). To believe in something as precise as to be the difference between eternal bliss and eternal damnation precludes errors of any type, ─ with horror called heresies─ before Vatican II. The Church’s mission to save souls through Christ alone gave the Church its only reason to be. The abandonment of Christ as the only means of salvation, which was Vatican II’s way of cheapening Christ relative to “whoever else be out there”, was a surreptitious way to deny His godliness. And, of course, the best way to turn the Church into an aimless institution. It is thus, undoubtedly, the greatest treason Christ has suffered since Judas. And as guilty is the first group, the modernizers, as the sede-occupantists that serve their purpose. This point has to be firmly understood: To formally accept apostatizers and heretics ─even while condemning their heresies─ is not only heretical, but suicidal.

This implicit denial of Christ’s incomparable uniqueness and divine nature that places Him infinitely above all, as the only possible savior of any single soul, and therefore of all mankind, is sufficient to establish, beyond any reasonable doubt, the treacherous essence of Vatican II and its aftermath; of its apostasy; of the reason why Christian transcendental truths could be substituted for the politically correct nonentities of diplomatic ecumenism. 

This abrupt loss through unwarranted changes of the Catholic Church’s unique and majestic personality, exchanged for worldwide acceptance and acclaim brought with it, in the words of its Divine Founder just what he warned us against: “You are the salt of the earth. But if the salt lose its flavor, wherewith shall it be salted? It is good for nothing anymore but to be cast out, and to be trodden on by men” (Mat 5:13).

The Gospel Smashers were, of course, demanding sede-occupantism to consolidate themselves. Sede-occupantism was the masterstroke needed to put behind any possibility of a counterstrike. It was the false flag operation to cover the rearguard of the subversive march triumphant. The compounding of these two forces of revolution and fake counterrevolution was the elegant provision to drug the alert into false confidence. It was the decoy to lure the many, to reduce them further into insignificance. 

All these machinations attest to a criminal intent longstanding since the Council: The obstinate will to destroy the legacy of Jesus Christ its Founder; indisputably, incontestably manifest in the obduracy to grant full and legitimate authority to its perpetrators; i.e., to respect and confirm as a legitimate pope whoever sits on Peter’s Throne independently of whether he aims to serve or to destroy the Church; to defend its essence or to transmogrify it. In other words, sede-occupantism’s: “because he sits there,” is the idiotic excuse to idolize the papacy regardless the consequences.

It is therefore misleading, fraudulent beyond measure to keep the name Christian for the outcome of this: the shambles of a force originally destined to conquer the whole world.

 It’s grotesquely absurd to still consider catholic (universal) the effeminate remnants of a heroic quest now reduced to a burocratic apparatus.

 It’s degrading beyond measure to exchange the spirit and principles of the conquerors over demons for the whims of the demons minions. 

It’s a mockery to substitute the true faith of the spirit victorious over the fancies and follies of the world for the world’s trivia.

 It’s abysmally blasphemous to substitute the heroism of triumphant holy chastity over the lusts of the flesh for the cowardly, and inhuman, and demonic degradations of the pederasts. In a nutshell: It’s idiotic to give up institutionally the glories of eternal bliss for the eternal fires of Hell for all of mankind. Yet, all of this is the inevitable outcome of renouncing its conquering Spirit; the only Spirit bearing witness to the omnipotence of its Founder.


Throughout the proceedings of the Council and its aftermath historical truth was falsified; liturgy, which is the expression of the faith as was preached every year throughout the year was desacralized; and its forms and trappings were also trivialized, and the demand for a single and true faith for the world was literally swept under the carpet. All of this in order to please the rest, and the entire world.

Historical truth was falsified by hiding the utter destruction of the Jews in the three Judeo-Roman Wars (66-135 A.D.) in order to glorify the Jews before the Council fathers and the whole world. This was done to rescue the Jews from the memory of their historical defeat and annihilation, preaching for them a false immunity from their deicide, instead of exalting Our Lord Jesus Christ's justice against them. Jesus' prophesy against them in Mat 22:7 was, of course, fulfilled: But when the king had heard of it, he was angry: and sending his armies, he destroyed those murderers and burnt their city. And His, God's armies, would no longer be the armies of the Jews, but the armies of Rome who destroyed the Jews; and in Rome He would set up His Church, and it would for a thousand years rule the world till the Protestant Revolution would limit its power preparing the world for the reign of the Antichrist.

Instead of this historical truth, the blatantly ignorant Conciliar fathers were fed with the fantasy of the Jews being forever immune as God’s chosen, and unforsakable people. This in flagrant contradiction of both, historical truth and Gospel truth. This, being history, is also present in the Talmud which, in Gittin 57b., claims that between 40 million and 4000 million Jews were killed by the Romans in the city of Bethar! The shameful ignorance of the Council’s fathers was certainly not limited to theological and scriptural matters. The real question is: What were they aware of ? A striking, and extreme example of ignoramus totus totum is the Conciliar Declaration known as Nostra Aetate, which from its first paragraph must have provoked an explosion of clamorous laughter and unstoppable derision throughout the still then wise lands of Christendom, laughter at the time not heard, being overwhelmed by the gigantic chorus of the antichristian, pro Council, mass media:
1.      In our time, when day by day mankind is being drawn closer together, and the ties between different peoples are becoming stronger, the Church examines more closely her relationship to non-Christian religions. In her task of promoting unity and love among men, indeed among nations, she considers above all in this declaration what men have in common and what draws them to fellowship.
What became of militant Christendom, for two thousand years shedding its blood for Christ’s Kingdom?
 Can this opening paragraph of Nostra aetate be less than the founding of the UR to parallel the UN? Is this not a declaration for the foundation of the United Religions in order to parallel the United Nations?
The basic truth that religions have always competed for world dominion is swept under the carpet in order to disarm Christendom, as obviously the Jews and Muslims laugh their hearts out at this ridiculous proposal. Muslims have also shed their blood throughout a millennium and a half to have Ala and Muhammad rule the world by the Koran! They shun this conciliar idiocy as leprosy unfit for human consumption; and as the proverbial powder keg of the Middle East proves once, and again, Nostra Aetate’s madness can only claim success in Christian spiritual disarmament and apostatizing folly.
But that’s not all, of course: The Masonic tenet of a Universal Fraternity fraught with the historical animosity and hatred of all that is Catholic is asserted in the following statement:

  5. We cannot truly call on God, the Father of all, if we refuse to treat in a brotherly way any man, created as he is in the image of God. Man's relation to God the Father and his relation to men his brothers are so linked together that Scripture says: "He who does not love does not know God" (1 John 4:8).

This is a terrible paragraph! It purports God to be the Father of all independently of many men's rejection of Him and His fatherhood. It claims all men to be in God's image when so many prove to be the image of the Devil himself. This intentional confusion from a Christian perspective is an absolute lie. From a scriptural standpoint it’s falsehood itself. And from all historical experience it’s simply ridiculous. From the very beginning, in Genesis 3:15, war is declared, enmity between the seed of the Devil and Mary’s seed is promised by God. And, Jesus Christ, the God of the Gospel, being the same God Creator of Genesis confirms this distinction to be essential to His Messianic Mission:

Mat 10:34  Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.
Luke 12:51  Suppose ye that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, Nay; but rather division:
Luke 19:27  But as for those my enemies, who would not have me reign over them, bring them hither and kill them before me.

Can something more dishonest than this Second Vatican Council ever be found? What about the sede-occupantists that uphold the authority of the popes that presided over this monumental achievement of asininity and falsehood? What about their credibility in trying as Catholics to preserve Freemasonry as the power over Christ’s Church?

The value of Scripture is the value of truth and clarity. From Genesis on men are divided into different and warring camps. War is the law of human nature, and even war to total annihilation of God's enemies is ordered by God to Israel. Brotherhood implies the same father, and purporting to mix God and the Devil under the same word 'father' in order to make a single group from them is the sin against the Holy Ghost. This obvious truth requires conversion for all to be a single flock, but convertion was the first thing that the post conciliar Church abandonned. The terrible paragraph was the conciliar countergospel that distiguished John Paul II's preaching of universal salvation by which, this denier of Hell told his faithful that Christ was lying, as Hell was not even a place so no one could go there! The effects of this teaching on criminal statistics is now beyond measure! Without fear of Hell man becomes a devil, or, as Hobbes had put it, without religion man is a beast.

The hypocritical Universal Fraternity purported by the Council is as false from a scriptural perspective as it is from any historical perspective. The Masonic Council known as the Second Vatican Council is the Council of ridicule and derision as befits a reunion of liars and ignoramuses. The occurrence of such takeover of the Church by liars was clearly foreseen and condemned by the Eternal Gospel in agreement with Genesis 3:15:

John 8:44 You are of your father the Devil: and the desires of your father you will do. He was a murderer from the beginning: and he stood not in the truth, because truth is not in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father thereof.

And the murder of the Church and the Devil’s reign of lies are being instituted through Vatican Council II, its lying, its apostasy, and its heresies.  
Now comes the worst part: The Conciliar Bishops were deceived into believing that modern Jews followed Moses’ teachings when the Babilonian Talmud they follow is the exact opposite of that! See:  http://www.come-and-hear.com/ Worse: it’s blasphemous of Our Lord Jesus Christ and of His Most Holy Mother using the basest of calumnies, wording and baseness against both! But they should have known as the whole Gospel attests to the rebellion of the Jews against the law since Gospel times! And Revelation 2:9 and 3:9 precludes excusing Jews from any possible Christian outlook, as their synagogue is of Satan:

Rev 2:9  I know thy tribulation and thy poverty: but thou art rich. And thou art blasphemed by them that say they are Jews and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.
Rev 3:9  Behold, I will bring of the synagogue of Satan, who say they are Jews and are not, but do lie. Behold, I will make them to come and adore before thy feet. And they shall know that I have loved thee.

So the relevant part of Nostra aetate referring to the Jews is another attempt to hide the realities of the Talmud. Ignorance of its contents cannot be pinned on the Council fathers alone or in general, as the book was kept secret until recently, a world now so changed by them that they feel they have nothing to fear by all idiocies, baseness, and crass immorality being traced back to their Babylonian Talmud. i.e., how can Benedict XVI condemn pederasty when the Talmud not only accepts it morally, but even instructs on its rules? 


They are: Our Christian Bible, the Koran of Islam, and the Talmud of the Rabbis. But only two of them contradict each other in an absolute way, offering the extremes necessary to accommodate everything in between in the same way that black and white as extremes accommodate all shades of gray; they are, thus, the relevant ones for positions to be examined and classified. These are the Bible and the Talmud. Even historically the later Koran in a sense being a hybrid had to fall in between, and as the Koran itself states, Muhammad was derided by his neighbors who told him that his stories were old tales amongst Christians and Jews.

Therefore, the “abomination of desolation”, the worst scandal imaginable, is to have the most radical contradiction to God’s Word surreptitiously entering the Church through the Council pushing in the Talmud's perversities to rule Chist's Church instead of the Bible, as was the hidden intention in the launching of Vatican Council II from the very beginning. 

Can sede-occupantists be ignorant to this extreme? 

We'll find an answer in articles to follow.