|Suspect the Devil for the worst and thou wilt not fail!|
"The Church will weep. The day is far off, but it will arrive without fault and near the day when two begin to make themselves sovereigns, but their days will not be many. You will see a sign, but you will not acknowledge it. However, do take note: In those times, women will dress like men and men like women." (Saint Vincent Ferrer 1350-1416)
The sign, the great unacknowledged sign has been the Second Vatican Council, And now, with Benedict returning to the Vatican we have two "sovereigns" living there. The plot, as we shall see, was well under way five decades before on the Council floor. The other sign of chaos —dress—has been carried further towards homosexual "marriage"
A Vatican ShamVatican II was the fulfillment of prophesy; of Gospel prophesy, of Pauline prophesy, of La Salette. It was to deny the divinity of Christ and the exclusive titles of the only church founded by Him by an artifice called ecumenism. It was to deny religious significance by substituting religious truth by its opposite: religious liberty —(imagine the school board celebrating liberty by accepting any digit as a result for 2 + 2 together with four!)
It performed an equivalent maneuver by contradicting the Gospel itself, especially the Lord’s final instructions before His ascent to heaven as they appear in Mark 16:15-16 "And he said to them: Go ye into the whole world and preach the gospel to every creature. He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved: but he that believeth not shall he condemned". Likewise in Mathew (Mat 28:18-19) and in Acts (1:8): "And Jesus coming, spoke to them, saying: All power is given to me in heaven and in earth. Going therefore, teach ye all nations: baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost.Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you. And behold I am with you all days, even to the consummation of the world". . . "But you shall receive the power of the Holy Ghost coming upon you, and you shall be witnesses unto me in Jerusalem, and in all Judea, and Samaria, and even to the uttermost part of the earth". (DRB—Emphasis by italics, boldfacing, and colorings by the author.)
By establishing the consequence of rejecting His Gospel as the cause of damnation, He was confirming His divine nature and role as only Judge (Mathew 25:31-46) that will separate humanity for eternity. Those on His right for eternal bliss, those on His left for eternal damnation. The role of His Church is thus to conquer the whole world in His Name alone and in no other; something only God, the only God of Israel whose only Son He proved to be by His resurrection could demand. Contrariwise, by the introduction of ecumenism by the Council, in the typical serving of a "cat for a hare on the plate," or the "pig in a poke" at the market, the Council switched from objective, literal Gospel truth, to an elusive but supposedly sufficient good will in all beliefs as a sufficient cause for salvation. This pairing of all creeds and founders on the same level —as incontestably exemplified on October 28th 1986 by John Paul II ecumenical meeting at Assissi, and commemorated twenty five years later by Ratzinger-Benedict at the same place— meant effectively degrading Christ to the level of Muhammad, Buddha, John Smith, plus whoever. And it was not the supreme council of a new sect, but the popes and the bishops of Rome at the Second Vatican Council!
By the introduction of such idiocies, the "corporate takeover" was in full swing to replace the Bible with the Talmud.
(....) "press reports hold out the promise that the Vatican offers an apology and a rejection of the way certain New Testament passages have been used throughout history to justify religious anti-Semitism. The Vatican publication is reported to declare the long "Jewish wait for the messiah is not in vain".
"(....) "When the English translation becomes available, one key question will be whether the Vatican acknowledges that the Jewish longing for the messiah is not only "valid," but also that there are no theological strings attached. That is, the messiah's identity remains unknown, and Jesus, whom Christians believe is the messiah, is not waiting at the end of days for Jews to recognize the "error of their ways."
"Because Judaism represented a living refutation of Christian truth claims, church leaders went to extraordinary lengths to "prove" the Old Testament predicted the coming of Jesus and his messiah-ship, something that Judaism does not accept. The Christian use and abuse of the Old Testament to buttress its claims remains a neuralgic point of dispute to this day. (Written February 22, 2002 by Rabbi A. James Rudin, as senior Interreligious adviser of the American Jewish Committee and a past chair of the International Jewish Committee on Interreligious consultations under the title: "While the Messiah Tarries...")
And Rabbi Rudin, speaking for and as an Antichrist can only surprise the ignorant, as Jews are fully conscious of being so. And the position is as radical as our Bibles openly declare: "Who is a liar, but he who denieth that Jesus is the Messiah (Christ)? This is Antichrist, who denieth the Father and the Son." (I John 2:22)
A Historical first from two anti-Catholic comediansDeuteronomy is final on the subject, one witness is not enough: Deut. 17:6 At the mouth of two witnesses, or three witnesses, shall he that is worthy of death be put to death; at the mouth of one witness he shall not be put to death. Deut. 19:15 One witness shall not rise up against a man for any iniquity, or for any sin, in any sin that he sinneth: at the mouth of two witnesses, or at the mouth of three witnesses, shall the matter be established. —So, to proceed with the ongoing plan by the living refutations of Christian truth to murder it, what could they find better than these two, guilty as they are of the apostasy of Vatican II?
Christ’s words: "Thou art Peter (Petrus=Rock), and upon this rock I will build my Church" cannot be pluralized or extended to include two. By these words The Lord was instituting an elective monarchy whereby only death could open way for succession through election, as celibacy precludes offspring. Millennia have consolidated the meaning of His words: The papacy demands the total responsibility of the elected; never a shared weakened responsibility. As Christ is not to be corrected, the head of the Antichrist can only stand to be crushed.
The evidence for this plot was manifest fifty years ago!
History, real history has always been a succession of plots and counterplots. They are the essence of power plays. History differs from journalism by finding the profound and mighty currents that incorporate century deep currents and crosscurrents into their outlook, while journalism is the kingdom where the trees conceal the forest, and on-going scandals —always prioritized— show the depths of its soul. Journalists often laugh at the word plot (especially if it refers to anti-Christian conspiracies), so historians necessarily and contemptuously have to laugh back at journalists. More could be said, but a single example will suffice, an example history —and journalism too— scrutinize under the name of Joseph Ratzinger.The undisputed historical text that links Ratzinger to the happenings and major events of the Second Vatican Council is Fr. Ralph Wiltgen’s (Director of the Council News Service) "The Rhine Flows Into the Tiber" -- Hawthorn Books, N.Y. 1967. Later by TAN Books). In it we find a precedent, and a preview of the plot which is about to be crowned by the Vatican denying -- even more openly-- that Jesus Christ is the expected Messiah of the Old Testament. In page 59 we meet the exultant Ratzinger of 50 years ago:
"The German theologian Father Joseph Ratzinger called the absence of any approved Council text at the end of the first session "the great, astonishing, and genuinely positive result of the first session." The fact that no text had gained approval was evidence, he said, of "the strong reaction against the spirit behind the preparatory work." This he called the truly "epoch-making character of the Council’s first session."
(And another now famous figure was also letting the cat out of the bag):
"Several days before the end of the first session, Father Hans Küng, a Swiss Theologian on the Catholic Theological Faculty of the University of Tübingen, Germany, was invited to speak at the U.S. Bishops’ Press Panel. In his address, he mentioned the fact that Pope John, when asked in a private conversation why he had convoked the Council, had gone to his window, opened it, and said, "To let some fresh air into the Church". Father Küng asserted jubilantly that what had once been the dream of an avant-garde group in the Church had "spread and permeated the entire atmosphere of the Church, due to the Council." If for some reason the Council itself were to come to an end, the movement in the Church would not end, he said, "and another Council would soon have to be called."
What makes this result so great, so astonishing to the point of being epoch-making in theologian Ratzinger's enthusiastic expressions? And just as important, what is the theological meaning of letting in fresh air from the world into the Church, as emphatically embraced by the pope to the extent of deserving the call for a Universal Council, and how does this explain Hans Küng’s triumphant jubilation?
The key lies in "the strong reaction against the spirit behind the preparatory work", —farther down we'll see this in detail—, and for those unaware of Catholic Theology, Ratzinger and Roncalli (John XXIII) were fully aware that there are only two spirits: The Holy Spirit of God: The Holy Ghost; and, the Devil. Spirits as opposed as their respective books: the Bible and the Talmud are to each other! No theologian can ignore this, and only a devil could rejoice like Ratzinger was already doing 50 years ago; many years before his being ordained a bishop and a cardinal and decades before being a pope; and he was already and overtly embracing his Talmud against the Bible. When the fly by night began to eulogize his theological views as those of "a conservative pope," he always responded that he had never altered his views since the Second Vatican Council.
John XXIII was also necessarily aware, like every catholic of his time was aware of Catholic teaching that men’s souls have three fundamental enemies (which are, conversely, the three champions of the talmudic synagogue [Rev 2:9 and 3:9]): The world, the flesh and the Devil. And therefore, that introducing "fresh air from the world", the spirit of the world afresh into the Church would necessarily entail bringing in the flesh and the Devil behind it, also afresh, into the Church in a commandeering way; as it happened indeed! As it happened through the well laid machinations whose eminences were the members of the "Rhine group" that included together with Ratzinger and Küng: Frings, Bea, Léger, Suenens, Alfrink, König, Murray, and many others, including at the time Malachi Martin, together with Roncalli and Montini (later to be Paul VI); all having the single objective of devastating the Church.
Fuller evidence is readily available a few pages back to understand what were the preparatory works –and their meaningful titles-- that made them so objectionable to young Fr. Ratzinger and his confederates, the revolutionary Rhine theologians and peritii. In pages 22-23 of the same work by Wiltgen we have the story of how a gigantic Catholic effort found its way to the trash can:
The preparatory work
"On July 13, 1962, three months before the opening of the Council, Pope John decreed that the first seven schemas, officially called the "First Series of Schemas of Constitutions and Decrees," should be sent to the Council Fathers around the world.
"Shortly thereafter seventeen Dutch bishops met at ‘s Hertogenbosch to discuss the schemas. There was general dissatisfaction with the first four dogmatic constitutions, entitled "Sources of Revelation," "Preserving Pure the Deposit of Faith," "Christian Moral Order," and "Chastity, Matrimony, the Family and Virginity," and general agreement that the fifth, on the liturgy, was the best. The proposal was then discussed and approved that a commentary should be prepared, and be widely distributed among the Council Fathers, pointing out the weaknesses of the dogmatic constitutions, and suggesting that the schema on the liturgy be placed first on the Council agenda". Let's remember these paragraphs as "Vatican II in a nutshell".
The above mentioned four —as their titles demonstrate— were truly Catholic schemas; therefore the alarms should have sounded the very moment it became known that they were being fundamentally objected to by the "Dutch bishops," here attacking them openly to avoid their being proclaimed dogmatic constitutions by the Council. They were, after all, not merely significant and necessary as they had been universally so recognized, they were the traditional Catholic doctrine reinstated for XX century man.
To the "Dutch bishops" of the Talmudic Revolution they were the abhorrent bulwarks, the formidable bastions destined to keep the Church Catholic. They were the stronghold which they had to destroy in order to turn the Church into its opposite; in order to substitute the Gospel with the Talmud, and Christ with Antichrist; in order to exchange the Ten Commandments for the Devil's as we can now see promoted around the world through pornography, birth control, abortion, pederasty, socialism, etc. Briefly: The solid doctrine and moral standards they represented seemed so unconquerable to the Rhine Group, that their fall was sufficient to explain both, the glee, and the astonishment on record. Centuries old objectives and planning had conquered as if by magic confirming The Holy Ghost had abandonned the Church —as in olden times God had abandonned Israel to its enemies— and the Devil was punitively and temporarily left in charge. Those aware of history, and of the Talmud's contents will realize —and by their titles alone— the total break with the Church Spirit that was evidenced by the general dissatisfaction of the Dutch bishops and the obvious apostasy to be incurred —and extended— by the dumping of these four major works (which were the result of a gigantic and truly Catholic effort) in favor of all the absurdities, stupidities, and degradations that have made millions leave the Church.
I repeat from above: "It was certain, however, that no other council had had a preparation "so vast, so diligently carried out, and so profound."
And the only certainty left was that no greater, or more crass, or more vast, or a more profound and evident conspiracy and apostasy could have ever taken place!
It had taken the Universal Church a three year and five-month worldwide effort in which, consultation with 2500 bishops and their local advisors throughout the globe was required for the Council’s dogmatic formulations to be finally schematized —thus the name "schemas"— for its internal, including pastoral work detailing what the Church was proposing through the only Twentieth-Century Council to modern man. True, this effort still had to be revised, voted, and finally approved by the bishops with the pope.
But never could even the thought be had before this stage was completed, that two thousand years of doctrine and morals could be subverted to the point where the Church would become the Anti-Church in order to preach a Counter-Gospel, and to have mutant popes to rule in the name of the Antichrist! Yet this is precisely what happened, and the only thing since then to be expected causing Ratzinger to exult in triumph; and Hans Küng to assert without further doubts that: "If for some reason the Council itself were to come to an end, the movement in the Church would not end, he said, "and another Council would soon have to be called," was that the contradiction to the former Catholic Spirit was by then so obvious as to need another council --if needed-- to finalize what sort of church --which this novelty had brought about-- should be called after its new meaning and revolutionary contents. Theologian Küng was by then aware —as all the members of the Rhine group of theologians— that he could fearlessly incur in all heresies, apostasies, fallacies and ambiguities, in unrestricted mockery having the pope and the council majority to back him.
Father Küng was asked to enumerate some of the achievements of the first session. In reply, he said that "many of us" had feared that unfortunate statements might be officially issued by the Council on matters of dogma and ecumenism. So far, however, "all such attempts have been rejected." This spirit in the Council had brought about a change of atmosphere throughout the Church. "No one who was here for the Council will go back home as he came. I myself never expected so many bold and explicit statements from the bishops on the Council floor."
Father Küng called the rejection of the schema on the sources of revelation "a great step in the right direction. It was something all of us in Germany had hoped for. But being a very small minority, we did not dream it possible."
Bishop Sergio Méndez Arceo of Cuernavaca, Mexico, said at the end of the session, "It has been a most successful Council." He noted that some Council Fathers had complained that there was too much talking and even too much repetition on the Council floor. "But I feel," he explained, "that this was necessary, if we were all to find out what the others’ thoughts were. St. Peter’s basilica, where our meetings were held, was like a giant pressure cooker which rapidly and profoundly transformed the outlook of the bishops of the entire world."
(After the Council bishop Méndez Arceo became a scandal to his faithful, and famous throughout Mexico for raising his fist in Marxist challenge from the pulpit in Sunday Masses.—blogger’s note.).
Wiltgen concludes this chapter with the words:
"Rejection of schemas and rapid transformations of outlook were the earmarks of the first session of Vatican ll."
Astoundingly, the whole Church was being transmogrified into Anti-Church. The prophesy of Our most Holy Mother Mary at La Salette was being fulfilled: "Rome will apostatize from the faith and become the See of the Anti-Christ. The Church will be in eclipse".
The depth of what was achieved in the first session to pervert future generations through revolutionary teaching was to be confirmed on October 28, 1965, when a declaration on Christian education carrying the title "Gravissimum educationis" was voted in its final form. This title meaning "On the grave duty to educate" future Catholics, carefully avoided the words virginity, purity and chastity found so objectionable to the aforementioned talmudic revolutionaries; emphasizing instead modern scientific discoveries obviously referring to, but still avoiding by name Darwin, Marx, and Freud; and most specially their talmudic origins. The world already inflamed by the world wide revolution was being pushed from one extreme to its opposite. The Catholic biblical ideal so clearly exposed and dearly defended for nineteen centuries of upholding the values that men had in common with angels, by subduing what man had in common with beasts would be thus put on its head; perverted, no less than by the only institution that had kept intact the fort of the spirit holding the opposite spirit of the beast at bay. Can the prophesy of La Salette be lacking proof?
Nothing is lacking, even the stones are shouting, and a poignant counter to the Talmud appeared recently in the press which quoted a Jewish woman on chastity: "What a beautiful thing, I never knew it existed." The Talmud is to be consulted at www.comeandhear.com
Much more is to be said, but the main fact for understanding the Church in its plight and current devastation is "the corporate takeover" of the Catholic Church by the old Pharisees with their Talmud. What we have always considered as the three enemies of the soul: the Devil, the world and the flesh (carnal lust) are championed from the Talmud as openly as from papal omissions, as the pederast scandals and cover-ups show.
The Christian Bible and the Talmud of the Rabbis contradict each other in an absolute way, offering the extremes necessary to accommodate everything in between in the same way that black and white as extremes accommodate all shades of gray; they are, thus, the relevant ones for positions to be examined and classified.
Therefore, the "abomination of desolation", the worst scandal imaginable, is to have the most radical contradiction to God’s Word surreptitiously entering the Church through the Council pushing in the Talmud's perversities to rule Christ’s Church instead of the Bible, as was the hidden intention in the launching of Vatican Council II from the very beginning—(see previous entries). And full evidence of this "corporate takeover" are overwhelming, and offer a better understanding of the two pope ploy.
The plan as we see it developing was put on the desk of pope Gregory XVI (1831-1846) by unknown hands. It read like a death sentence for the Church and would later be published by instructios of pope Pius IX, his successor to the throne. "The Permanent Instruction of the Alta Vendita," —as it was called in reference to the Carbonari Italian Masonic Lodge that penned it— which can be interpreted as of the Alta Vendetta (Supreme Vengeance) startled both popes with its basic truism: Nothing is simpler than to make one’s self pass for a Catholic.
Our Lord had set a war against the world, and this war on selfish lust and greed was to build Western Civilization. Under the incentive of the Four Last Things: Death, Judgement, Heaven or Hell, humanity was compelled to new hights, to seek that which made spiritual man; to be closer to angels and loathsome of similarities to the beasts. It was for nearly two thousand years the only successful corporative world wide effort to keep man erect and civilization on rails.
Unfailing to recognize, as it was inevitable, the majesty and power of the Catholic Church; its millenary enemy, the only enemy with messianic ambitions of its own and a radically opposite creed decided not to destroy it, but to use it for its own ends by occupying its head and all its main posts. The synagogue of Satan threw its full power, the world monopoly of the mass media, of world finance, and of world wide political structures harnessed by its secret arm of freemasonry; and by its fists of communism and diverse flavours of socialism to penetrate it, in its quest for the single world wide government and tyranny of its make. Therefore, the foe representing the antipodal paradigm of lust, wordly ambition and greed wouold not find a better way than usurpation. And the Permannent Instruction of the AltaVendita reads as follows:
"Let the clergy march under your standard, always believing that they are marching under the banner of the Apostolic keys. (A 95% success through The Second Vatican Council).
"You intend to make the last vestige of tyrants and the oppressors disappear; lay your nets like Simon Bar-Jona; lay them in the sacristies, the seminaries and the monasteries rather than at the bottom of the sea: and, if you do not hurry, we promise you a catch more miraculous than his. The fisher of fish became the fisher of men; you will bring friends around the Apostolic Chair.
"You will have preached a revolution in tiara and in cope, marching with the cross and the banner a revolution that will need to be only a little bit urged on to set fire to the four corners of the World".
And since the mid-nineteenth century, the message from Our Lady of La Salette told us they would be successful, as they have: "Rome will apostatize from the faith and become the See of the Antichrist. The Church will be in eclipse".