lunes, 21 de marzo de 2016


Let no man be deceived...

What the minimum organizational wisdom requires can be seen in the way small children get together to form a team; they do so, firstly, by selecting a team captain.

Can Divine Wisdom be less wise?

Let’s emphasize this!

Small children do this, intuitively, in order for the group to function with the power and efficacy of a unit capable of beating opposing teams. A childish requirement.

What can be said, then, to be required in order to form a team to conquer the whole world; a conquest ordered by The Lord Himself which the apostate Vatican II Council was set up to deny?

And he said to them: Go ye into the whole world and preach the gospel to every creature. He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved: but he that believeth not shall he condemned. (Mark 16:15-16)
Going therefore, teach ye all nations: baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost. (Mat 28:19)
He that is not with me, is against me: and he that gathereth not with me, scattereth. (Mat 12:30)

How is it possible, then, that with and since the Reformation this most basic wisdom has been rejected in order to follow the XVI Century reformers?

The pope is the most basic requirement set up by Our Lord Jesus Christ for those which wish to call themselves Christians:

And Jesus answering said to him: Blessed art thou, Simon Bar-Jona: because flesh and blood hath not revealed it to thee, but my Father who is in heaven. And I say to thee: That thou art Peter; and upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. And I will give to thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven. And whatsoever thou shalt bind upon earth, it shall be bound also in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth, it shall be loosed also in heaven. (Mat 16:17-19)

A full delegation of authority, and a model, a paradigm for such a resounding appointment! And it couldn’t be less for the papabile of God the Father Himself!
However, this was only the setting of the stage for what came immediately afterwards, and is set forth as Divine Wisdom demanded to balance the authority first granted for all times. So when the newly named pope dares to take the initiative, instead of submitting humbly as his new role demanded to the Will of the Father, his reprimand went to the limits of a total personal rejection, an excommunication, and he was called, as he deserved, SATAN!

And Peter taking him, began to rebuke him, saying: Lord, be it far from thee, this shall not be unto thee. Who turning, said to Peter: Go behind me, Satan, thou art a scandal unto me: because thou savourest not the things that are of God, but the things that are of men. (Mat 16:22-23)

This “Stand not in front of me Satan”, presents forcefully the impossibility for the Vicar to put himself in a forward position, and to thus steal the first place and the initiative from his Master −a thing of Satan− which is the worst danger any pope can bring to Christ’s Church; and, as a consequence, the total rejection of the wrong doer left him temporarily excommunicated in the severest terms recorded.  

Not even the traitor, Judas, would receive so terrible a condemnation in Christ’s words.

This event highlights the basic need and importance of the papacy by its opposite due to its inevitable consequences. By the fundamental requirement outside of which he is no Peter, he is no pope if he chooses the sympathies and ways of men over the strict laws of God. A pope can’t be below the prophets of Old who always sided with God against the corrupt and sinful ways of men, as Christ himself exemplified and demanded:

If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me. For whosoever will save his life shall lose it: and whosoever will lose his life for my sake shall find it. (Mat 16:24-25)

 A requirement that could only be filled by being as intolerant to human corruption as Christ was against the Jews, the brood of vipers (Mat 23:33), the sons of the Devil (John 8:44). His demands are no less than staggering: “Be perfect as your Father in Heaven is perfect” (Mat 5:48). So, the power and dignity of a pope leaves no chance for a middle ground: If he is no Peter then he is Satan. There is no way around this fact; and with it, the radical demand to avoid all human temptations for an aggiornamento ordered to succumb to the demands of the world: "because thou savourest not the things that are of God, but the things that are of men" is the reproach!

This is the Gospel itself, by which the complete theology of the papacy is fixed; as theology is, by definition: human intelligence applied to Scripture.  Where Scripture comes from God, and human intelligence is the weakest and always the suspect part in need of correction from Scripture itself. The strong words of the Lord to Peter are the clear and definitive judgement set upon all legitimate popes for all times, to whom it is forbidden to contradict Scripture, as Scripture has come from the Father, and which, therefore, not even the Son can change. Thus we find that inerrancy has been granted to Scripture alone, and that the pope must submit himself to be the servant and the defender of Scripture which rules forever above him. He is called to interpret it, but he cannot contradict its words.

John 10:35 If he called them gods to whom the word of God was spoken; and the scripture cannot be broken: and it would have been absurd to have said the same of Peter as the Gospel itself testifies. On answering Satan’s temptations in the desert, Our Lord requires only Scripture, the immutable Will of the Father to defeat him, thus honoring His Father also, and the same “for it is written” which is unchangeable even for Christ Himself, appears in Mat 4:6, 4:7 and 4:10.

Thus, the limit between Christ and Antichrist has been set on an irrefutable basis, and the basis is Scripture, which, coming from The Father, Christ Himself guarantees to be above popes. ─What follows is a mere abridgment:

 When therefore you shall see the abomination of desolation, which was spoken of by Daniel the prophet, standing in the holy place: he that readeth let him understand. (Mat 24:15) In other words, when Satan would take over the See of Peter at the end of times; as this was clearly confirmed at La Salette.

Unmistakably, not only legitimate popes had to be kept in order, with the Church as a whole to be vigilant on the popes fulfilling the role of the prophets of old which always took sides with God’s Law against the transgressions of sinners; but a time would come when Satan himself would rule from the Vatican and sin would no longer be condemned, nor Hell and Purgatory remembered. This complete picture, standing upon the fullness of Biblical revelation is an additional proof of La Salette being fulfilled: “Rome will apostatize from the faith to become the Seat of the Antichrist, the Church will be in eclipse.” Which is, needless to say, in perfect agreement with the Gospel above. And the Most Holy Virgin who appeared at La Salette in 1846, in the only Marian Apparition shedding unstoppable tears, because there were no longer chaste priests worthy of saying Mass, announced the horrors of chastisements and wars to come. The then secret of La Salette to be revealed in 1858, following the Gospel’s rule of the organic growth of tares with the wheat (Mat 13:24-30), would delay 100 years till 1958 when the last pope before the “abomination of desolation” would be murdered to open the papacy to Satan’s ministers which would follow in line from John XXIII until today. 

In this context, in 1870 the First Vatican Council presented the world with a Dogmatic Constitution on Papal Infallibility known as “Pastor aeternus” which would sow confusion and scandal henceforth. It must be said that due care was taken by the Council to preserve the necessary agreement of the pope’s teaching, his magisterium to Holy Scripture as can be seen from the following excerpts from numbers 5 to 6: The Roman pontiffs... defined as doctrines to be held those things which, by God's help, they knew to be in keeping with
§  sacred scripture and
§  the apostolic traditions.
For the holy Spirit was promised to the successors of Peter not so that they might, by his revelation, make known some new doctrine,
o    but that, by his assistance, they might religiously guard and faithfully expound the revelation or deposit of faith transmitted by the apostles.

These caveats would appear to be overridden in the final lines:

o    we teach and define as a divinely revealed dogma that
§  when the Roman pontiff speaks EX CATHEDRA,
§  that is, when,
1.     in the exercise of his office as shepherd and teacher of all Christians,
2.     in virtue of his supreme apostolic authority,
3.     he defines a doctrine concerning faith or morals to be held by the whole church,
§  he possesses,
§  by the divine assistance promised to him in blessed Peter,
§  that infallibility which the divine Redeemer willed his church to enjoy in defining doctrine concerning faith or morals.
§  Therefore, such definitions of the Roman pontiff are of themselves, and not by the consent of the church, irreformable.

2.     So then, should anyone, which God forbid, have the temerity to reject this definition of ours: let him be anathema.

By these conclusions he was contradicting the “Go behind me, Satan”, and in wording declaring his −the pope’s− independence from the constraints of Holy Scripture itself. The meaning is made unequivocal by the statement:

 are of themselves, and not by the consent of the church, irreformable”. A declaration of independence without precedent and for all times!

The missing part which made it objectionable, was the omission of two previous lines which were necessary to fix it as follows:

─“that infallibility which the divine Redeemer willed his church to enjoy for as long as it remained in keeping with sacred scripture and the apostolic traditions in defining doctrine concerning faith or morals”.─ Unfortunately, this was not so, and the omission was to have terrible consequences, as this independence would permit popes to destroy the Church. Even worse, to alter Christ’s Church all the way to its opposite in faith and morals as it now stands.

This “for as long as it remained” would have restored the necessary order, as the pope would be only the interpreter of an otherwise fixed, and infallible Holy Scripture, with his personal infallibility arising from fidelity to Holy Scripture itself.

It would be God Himself Who, in order to give full credence back to Holy Scripture, and to Mary Most Holy’s words at La Salette, that an immediate and unprecedented punishment would take place against Pope and Council with the revolutionary forces of the Freemasons under Garibaldi, and the ambition of king Vittorio Emanuele, empowered to assault and rob the Vatican of its remaining Papal States.
 It would be a total impoverishment, until Mussolini, on June 7, 1929, gave back the minimal Vatican territory to the previous owners of the huge Papal States which, since 754 A.D., had covered most of the modern Italian regions of Lazio which includes the city of Rome, Marche, Umbria, Romagna, and portions of Emilia; henceforth definitely lost.

It is a historical fact that the enormous land appropriation had begun with Napoleon Bonaparte in 1791, and the land theft became unstoppable proceeding with gigantic bites on the Papal States; but in 1860 this was partially reversed by the French themselves, then giving back the Lazio (which of course comprised the whole of the city of Rome) to its rightful sovereign. So, it must be admitted, Divine Providence underlined by this temporary 10-year restoration the sentence from Above, which ended with a mendicant pope barely rescued by American private donations for survival.  The Council too was forced to an abrupt, unfinished ending; and worse, if worse could be, by its signs of doom; as none of the Catholic nations offered any help for restitution or economic support, and many Italians rejoiced in having a greater Italy. La Salette itself was further credited by events fully explaining the divine reasons which were, in Our Lady’s words, that there were no longer chaste priests to officiate Holy Mass. In other words: “If you deprive the Holy Sacrifice from the dignity of worthy celebrants, God will deprive you of the dignity you have enjoyed through your worldly belongings”. The message of Our Lady made this clear by telling Maximin and Melanie of the hunger to come through the plague eating their harvests. If you repented, and turned to God by keeping Sunday holy (the Mass) and due rest, God would give you on that account your livelihood even if you didn’t work for it. This, in 1846, gave enough time for reform. Unfortunately, the malfeasants within the Church convinced pope Pius IX that priests were not as described “wells of impurity unfit to say Mass”, and the message was discarded as false. But God is not to be discarded, nor are His Judgments to be ridiculed, so the punishment proceeded to its completion in order to discredit a pope that would not discipline his clergy. Truly, God had never before shown more clearly His displeasure with His Church, and the evident reason for this discredit formally being that papal infallibility (immediately ridiculed by conservative Catholics) can be had through only one source: Holy Scripture; as otherwise a conflict between infallible sources was prone to arise as has been evident since John XXIII onwards. So, despite the caveats the whole issue was entirely misplaced by Pastor aeternus. The revolution leading to the greater punishment of the Second Vatican Council forged ahead. Who can deny God’s judgement to have spoken in agreement with Our Lady of La Salette’s prophesy on Rome becoming the seat of the Antichrist?


For the mystery of iniquity already worketh: only that he (Saint Michael) who now holdeth do hold, until he be taken out of the way (By the change in the Mass by pope Paul VI which eliminated formally the prayer to St. Michael) (2Th 2:7).

 And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie (which was to be from Pastor aeternus, to Vatican Council II and its aftermath): That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness. (2Th 2:10-12)

This strong delusion was to be grounded on the definition of infallibility. And even today most people accept whatever the pope says as if it came out of the mouth of God; as if Christ had set a papacy if not above Scripture, at least independent of Scripture, and therefore above God the Father Himself!

And the faithful have thus become poor sheep, which, no longer being in the faith, instead of revolting against this revolutionary mafia are simply abandoning the Church.

Pastor aeternus has certainly done its damage. And for a better understanding of the damage inflicted one must remember that all damages, up to criminal damages have guilt arising not only from action, but by omission. The conduct demanded from all public authorities is to promote good and to oppose evil; and to distinguish publicly and forcefully between good and evil by punishing all evil appropriately. And if this is required from every authority, the most obliged to do justice is this regard is Catholic Church. However, the revolution in the Church known as the Second Vatican Council has done the opposite, it has called truth a lie, it has imposed lies as truths, it has promoted evils and opposed the Gospel.

The consequences of this are also to be seen from prophesy to its actual fulfillment in the moral standing of popes from John XXIII all the way to pope Francis:

“And he cried mightily with a strong voice, saying, Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird”. (Revelation 18:2):

This is now not only history, but actuality: Pederasty, unopposed homosexuality, pro abortionist nuns kept in communion publicly with Rome; a world fired up by pornography, Viagra, exaltation of lust in all its forms; and even the cult of Satan confirm all this for our days. Can you see where the “infallibility in faith and morals” has left the Church with popes from John XXIII onward, omitting their duty to discipline adequately their clerical ranks, and the total darkness we would be in as a result, were it not for the manifest displeasure of the Almighty God, the clarity of prophesy, and the Gospel on the subject?

Prophesy Fulfilled

The future has been revealed by prophesy; but once prophesy has been fulfilled it becomes history, and history can be traced with precision. The suspects of plotting against Christianity were, without doubt, the rabbis; as the objective of the Council was not only to change the Church, but to recognize Judaism as a religion on equal standing with Christianity; and worse still, to free them from the charges of deicide. This contradicts the Gospel on both counts, firstly, as the only way to deny deicide is to deny Christ’s divinity and human nature; and the fact the Jews were not recognized by the Lord as Jews, due to their having abandoned the teachings of Moses; so, if the Jews were no longer Jews, but apostates at the times of Jesus, how could a Church Council turn them into Jews centuries later?

From a Christian perspective, the very existence of the Jews could only be justified by Christ being born from the tribe of Judah, as He was; and with the only justification for them to continue to exist could only be as followers of His, no longer Jews but Christians, with Him as their only Messiah and following Him into His Church.
As we know from history, however, just a few thousand Jews followed him and thus became His disciples, His apostles, His priests and evangelizers; while the rest fought His Very Name seeking always to bring all of His followers to death on charges of idolatry.

It is in itself ridiculous for the Church to say Christ was a Jew in the sense of actual Jews, and even in the sense of the Jews of His time on earth. Firstly, because God is too great to confine Him to a single people; and this, worse still, to the people He rejected and which rejected Him to the extreme of crucifying Him. Christ’s total rejection of the Jews is the message of the Gospel itself. It can be read to the most minute detail without finding a word of compliment towards the Jews. In the same way, the Gospel can be read without finding a single negative comment against the Romans, and the Romans were the invaders. He condemned the Jews to the loss of God’s favor: Therefore I say to you that the kingdom of God shall be taken from you and shall be given to a nation yielding the fruits thereof. (Mat 21:43), and condemned them to death as a nation: “But as for those my enemies, who would not have me reign over them, bring them hither and kill them before me”. (Luke 19:27) But when the king had heard of it, he was angry: and sending his armies, he destroyed those murderers and burnt their city. (Mat 22:7) 
His Godly Judgement upon them as a brood of vipers (Gen 3:15); Whited sepulchers (Mat 23:27); And sons of the Devil (John 8:44), follow in Revelation 2:9, and 3:9 in which Christ denies them the right to call themselves Jews; and damns them from a religious standpoint together with Satan and for all times: I know thy tribulation and thy poverty: but thou art rich. And thou art blasphemed by them that say they are Jews and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan. (Rev 2:9) The nation named by the Lord to receive the kingdom of God were to be the Romans, and His armies were the armies of Rome which, in the three Judeo-Roman Wars would literally wipe them out of existence with the exception of a small remnant as the Talmud itself testifies in Gittin 57b. This remnant would survive to pass on the book of the “Synagogue of Satan” as the Bible states to the Khazars, a Turkish and very powerful nation living in the seventh to tenth century to the north, and in between the Black and the Caspian seas. This powerful nation took to the Talmud and its diabolical content converting to Talmudic Judaism, and represents according to Koestler 95% of actual Jews, a fact currently denied by them that plan to rule the world from the Vatican with Satan’s Talmud of Babylon. This book can be downloaded from a book which, of course, due to its demonic content is not even mentioned by the Fathers of the Second Vatican Council, as the rabbinical plot would have been made impossible.

After setting the historical aspects straight, we can return to the Apocalypse to complete the picture with the Bible. The Apocalyptic times we are living cover basically from chapter XVII onward, in which the Great Harlot of Babylon is described, for such name fits precisely the above mentioned book, and these chapters also describe with utmost precision its spirit. In other words, it could be said that this book, which presents a spirit which is precisely the opposite of the Bible in every respect, deserves to be called Satan’s book with the same precision the Holy Bible deserves to be called the book of the Holy Ghost. Therefore, we cannot be realistic without knowing both, as all human reality from Holiness to Satanism necessarily lie in between: all lights and all darkness, all doctrines, all cults, all political creeds, all superstitions. Everything that is not morally  in them must necessarily be between them. It is like having directly from the Garden of Eden both: The Tree of Life, and the Tree of Knowledge of Evil from which, having chosen to live, humanity must drink from its cup to the dregs. A terrible, but undoubtedly an apocalyptic destiny.

From Chapter XIII we have the description of the satanic popes: “And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spoke as a dragon”. A representative of the Lamb, a pope, which “because there is no truth in him. When he speaks a lie, he speaks of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it. (John 8:44)”.

And it was given him to give life to the image of the beast: and that the image of the beast should speak: and should cause that whosoever will not adore the image of the beast should be slain. And he shall make all, both little and great, rich and poor, freemen and bondmen, to have a character in their right hand or on their foreheads:  And that no man might buy or sell, but he that hath the character, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. Here is wisdom. He that hath understanding, let him count the number of the beast. For it is the number of a man: and the number of him is six hundred sixty-six. (Rev 13:15-18) 666 is the result of the addition, and what is being added is lines, six of them. An hexagon’s sides, and six triangles which make up the “Star of David,” where obviously David is the man. Different geometrical shapes are needed to separate units from tens, and from hundreds. Remember that our Arab positional characters would not be known in Europe until the fourteenth century.

As to the first beast with seven heads of Chapter XIII, one of which, after having a mortal wound was healed, we'll see why this fits the State of Israel; as it was razed by the Roman armies by 135 A.D.; and reappeared in 1948 by decree of the United Nations. This is thus a confirmed fact, as the Star of David is its national flag. But furthermore, there is the mighty image which time has revealed as the Internet, having the power described. It is like the umbilical cord in the unborn to the world's economy, commerce and finance. A false god whose power is as close an imitation of God's power as can be humanly constructed. By sheer comfort and convenience, everyone is falling into the web of this Spider of Sionism. By simply restricting access to those which will not comply to the request of accepting its seal as it is forewarned, death by total destitution and hunger awaits:

"And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice: If any man shall adore the beast and his image and receive his character in his forehead or in his hand, he also shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is mingled with pure wine in the cup of his wrath: and shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the sight of the holy angels and in the sight of the Lamb. And the smoke of their torments, shall ascend up for ever and ever: neither have they rest day nor night, who have adored the beast and his image and whoever receiveth the character of his name. Here is the patience of the saints, who keep the commandments of God and the faith of Jesus"(Rev 14:9-12) 

 Who can doubt the precision of the Bible, or the significance of the moment in which all is being deciphered?

 We call in Christ's Name unto Michael the Archangel to devastate Satan’s forces:

Who is like unto God!