THERE IS NO VALID POPE FRANCIS!!! --- INVALID CONCLAVE !!!

Distinguishing between the de facto and the de jure in Church events.





Lightning struck attesting to the fulfillment of Daniel's prophesy!

THERE IS NO POPE FRANCIS !!!

 This is the 'de facto' statement implied in Benedict's resignation against the conclave that elected him! So, from then on --on Benedict's testimony-- conclaves are invalid which means the cardinals aren't cardinals either --again by Benedict's testimony--, being incompetent to elect a pope!

THIS IS THE LAW, THIS IS THE FAITH.  
 Let's reason this out: A papal election has always been a major event, not only for Catholics, but for the entire evangelized world. However, never before had circumstances been more revealing. A papal resignation hadn't occurred in seven centuries; but more relevantly, previous resignations had been forced by imposing circumstances which left no alternative to the abdicator but to abdicate. Circumstances like banishment by imperial authorities, exile under persecution, all of them practically equivalent to a sede vacante; and only a previous case in which the incumbent had been forced to accept --by a non conclave in order to break a two year sede vacante impasse-- and thus could not be seriously expected to remain where neither his competence for the post nor his vocation could hold him. In this case, that of Pietro da Morrone in 1294 --to be later canonized as St. Celestine V-- it would mean a short reign of only 161 days.

 But Benedict's resignation is an absolute scandal to all those who rightfully feel this has been another destructive maneuver directed towards devastating the papacy; a defacement, an additional desacralization of what many consider necessarily holy and demandingly above reproach.

IS THE FUNERAL OF JOHN PAUL II MENTIONED IN THE GOSPEL?

Versión al inglés del original sito en: clic aquí.

After paying homage to Christ's enemy, the same government is readying to chop off all Cristian's heads in the USA 

George W. Bush, Laura Bush, George H. W. Bush, Bill Clinton, Condoleezza Rice, and Andrew Card

He had gone from Gog to Magog to achive unity against Christ, he devastated the faith in his encyclicals, and left a Church in shambles.

By the Talmudic Noahide laws Christians must be put to death for idolatry

Wheresoever the body shall be, there shall the eagles also be gathered together.

 As can be easily appreciated, the Gospel is fundamental to our understanding of Revelation on the end of times; and this in precise reference to the eschatological discourse in Matthew 24 giving us the signs that will precede the coming of Our Lord Jesus Christ.

 Let’s quote:

Lo, I have foretold it to you! “If therefore they shall say to you: ‘Behold he is in the desert’, go ye not out: ‘Behold he is in the closets’, believe it not. For as lightning cometh out of the east, and appeareth even into the west: so shall the coming of the Son of man be. Wheresoever the body shall be, there shall the eagles also be gathered together.

 INCONTROVERTIBLE SIGNS, and the eagles on the body. 
This mysterious phrase has put translators to the test. Since the eagles on the body are one more sign, among many, that we find in chapter 24 of Saint Matthew to identify the end of time and the return of Our Lord in Glory, hence the importance of the translations that we are about to see.

Thank you Atila Sinke Guimaraes for your summary

It Is Impossible To Beatify John Paul II

 Luis de Guerrero Osio y Rivas

 Summary of his Open Letter

 Our Lord Jesus Christ did not preach the same message as Buddha or Mohammed. The difference is even clearer between the Gospel of Christ and the preaching of the Jews, who rejected Jesus and ended by committing the Deicide. Further, with their Babylonian Talmud they entered Satanism and so fulfilled the prophecy of the Apocalypse (2:9, 3:9).

 These differences show the importance of the encounter at Assisi where John Paul II - as the highest exponent of the Modernism of Vatican II - tried to erase them by accepting the heresies along with the Gospel, and presenting the false religions as competing with the Church in giving honor to God.

 The characteristic of the true Catholic Church is to stress her differences from the false religions and distance herself from them as the one and only religion that honors Christ. She singled out and condemned the heretics. She promoted missions to convert those lost sheep.

Instead, the New Church, moved by human respect, has promoted ecumenism. It has minimized all the differences and established dialogue with the heretics. This ends with a single common denominator for all, which is the religion of man.

 The Catholic Church of old was unique and inimitable because Christ our Master and Lord is one and inimitable. If the Church abandons her identity and no longer belongs to the One True God, she loses her raison d’être.

The Seat of the Antichrist... Prophesy fulfilled!

St. Peter's Dome is blown away by Vatican Council II: The Rhine overflows contaminating the Tiber. . .  "When therefore you shall see the abomination of desolation, which was spoken of by Daniel the prophet, standing in the holy place". . . "Rome will apostatize and become the seat of the Antichrist. The Church will be in eclipse".

The total of our faith is founded on prophesy.

The first quotation is Mat 24:15, the second is from Our Lady of La Salette. Our Lord exalts Daniel's "Yea, he magnified himself even to the prince of the host, and by him the daily sacrifice was taken away, and the place of his sanctuary was cast down" Daniel 8:11. The head of the army, the prince of the host, den Fürsten des Heeres, hasta el jefe del ejército, ad principem fortitudinis magnificatus est, jusqu'au chef de l'armée. . . all Bibles, Catholic and Protestant, and in all languages convey the same message: The usurper, the goat that came flying over the face of the whole earth aggrandized itself to take over the papacy. "And I understood: and behold a he goat came from the west on the face of the whole earth, and he touched not the ground," (Dan 8:5)

 Only the pope could take away the daily sacrifice of the New Testament: the Holy Mass. This prophesy was fulfilled by the "Bugnini Novus Ordo Mass" decreed by Paul VI. No longer was it to be the Sacrifice on the Cross of Calvary, no longer a sacrifice, but a mockery of the Last Supper. This prophecy is fulfilled prophecy for and in our times, as flying armies are as Newtestamentary as the Second World War is modern! It is also in agreement with Mathew 25:32-54, "And before him shall be gathered all nations:

The Invaders, and. .

A brief English digest of the many previous articles in Spanish:

THE SEDEOCCUPANTIST HERESY

 By Luis de Guerrero Osio y Rivas

Just because they are there?

 Rome will apostatize and become the seat of the Antichrist.

The Church will be in eclipse. (La Salette)

Two heresies have been launched in the last 60 years seeking to destroy the Catholic Church, Modernism and Sede-occupantism. The first was recognized as the sum of all heresies by Pope St. Pius X; the second is easily recognizable by demands to grant full status ─and the corresponding authority of the papacy─ to the first group while pretending to remain orthodox in their beliefs. This two pronged attack ─one to revolutionize and the other to justify the legitimacy of the first group while disagreeing only on points of doctrine─ were literally an invasion of the Catholic Church by the agents of the spirit of apostasy. The apostasy of the Modernist group which defined itself by a revolutionary set of principles comprised in the doctrine of an apostate council known to history as the Second Vatican Council and its aftermath.

Breve apunte sobre un artículo de M. Richard Williamson ante la ya inocultable traición.

Domingo 27 mayo 2012

– ELEISON CCLIV

Foto tomada de Radio Cristiandad

Dice M. Williamson:

“Libros enteros han sido escritos sobre el tema de la libertad religiosa como la enseña el Concilio Vaticano II en su Declaración de 1965, Dignitatis Humanae. No obstante, la enseñanza revolucionaria de ese documento es clara: dada la dignidad natural de cada ser humano, ningún estado ni grupo social ni poder humano alguno puede obligar o forzar a hombre o grupo de hombres a actuar, en privado o en público, en contra de sus propias creencias religiosas, siempre y cuando se observe el orden público (DH # 2).

“Por el contrario, la Iglesia Católica siempre enseñó, hasta el Concilio Vaticano II, que todo Estado en cuanto tal tiene el derecho y aun el deber de impedir coercitivamente a sus ciudadanos de practicar públicamente cualquiera de sus falsas religiones, id est, todas las religiones no católicas, en tanto que tal imposición sea útil y no perjudicial para la salvación de las almas... 

Estos dos párrafos retratan una situación correctamente descrita como revolucionaria por el obispo, el cual, como obispo, enfatiza que la salvación de las almas es lo propio de la Iglesia; y que cualquier criterio contrario es devastador de su naturaleza misma. 

Para ello conviene analizar si el documento conciliar Dignitatis Humanae que parte del concepto de lo que es la dignidad humana para predicar lo correspondiente es válido; o, si por el contrario, es fraudulento como en el fondo denuncia M. Williamson.

Veamos:

Roma Contra el Anticristo. Triunfo Milenario y Debacle Actual.

¿Qué es eso del Anticristo?

El origen del término está en la Sagrada Escritura, y aparece únicamente en ella, y aparece cuatro veces tan solo: las cuatro en las epístolas de San Juan: I Juan 2:18; 2:22 y 4:3; y II Juan 0:7.

Lo primero a recordar es que Cristo (en griego) y Mesías (en hebreo) son exactamente lo mismo, de manera que Anticristo y Antimesías señalan el mismo problema como aparece en el Evangelio:

Yo he venido en nombre de mi Padre, y no me recibís; si otro viene en su propio nombre, a ése le recibiréis. (Juan 5:43)

Cristo y Anticristo es es un tema que puede darse únicamente dentro del judaísmo y dentro del cristianismo. Solo los judíos han estado llenos de expectativas mesiánicas. Los demás pueblos y culturas carecen de una idea similar. Dicho en otras palabras: el Anticristo no sería localizable ni como idea entre otros pueblos. Por esta razón Jesucristo N.S. al hablar del tema no se dirige a griegos, árabes o romanos; sino exclusivamente a los judíos. Resumiendo: Cristo es quien divide: «¿Creéis que estoy aquí para dar paz a la tierra? No, os lo aseguro, sino división. (Lucas 12:51) Y así como divide la historia en antes de Él y después de Él; también divide a Israel en Su Iglesia (cristianos) y el Anticristo (judíos) para que luchen hasta el final de los tiempos.


Eran igualmente judíos aquellos a quienes se refiere San Juan cuando habla de su negativa a aceptar a Jesús como el Mesías:

¿Quién es el mentiroso sino el que niega que Jesús es el Cristo (Mesías)? Ese es el Anticristo, el que niega al Padre y al Hijo. (I Juan 2:22)

Estamos hablando por tanto de un problema que tenemos los cristianos exclusivamente con los judíos. Y los judíos con los cristianos.